The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7

The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7

Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False

eBook - 2012
Average Rating:
Rate this:
At 5: 20 in the afternoon on 9/11, Building 7 of the World Trade Center collapsed, even though it had not been struck by a plane and had fires on only a few floors. The reason for its collapse was considered a mystery. In August 2008, NIST (the National Institute of Standards and Technology) issued its report on WTC 7, declaring that "the reason for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 is no longer a mystery" and that "science is really behind what we have said." Showing that neither of these claims is true, David Ray Griffin demonstrates that NIST is guilty of the most serious types of scientific fraud: fabricating, falsifying, and ignoring evidence. He also shows that NIST's report left intact the central mystery: How could a building damaged by fire-not explosives-have come down in free fall?
Publisher: [United States] : Interlink Publishing : Made available through hoopla, 2012
ISBN: 9781623710262
Characteristics: 1 online resource
Additional Contributors: hoopla digital


From the critics

Community Activity


Add a Comment

Jul 11, 2014

This is an excellent book. It is not an easy read, both for tediously technical and psychological/emotional reasons, but it is a ncessary read. The very first NIST study on the collapse of the two towers was withdrawn; it had posited that the collapse emulated a controlled demolition: both towers structural integrity just happened to completely fail at the same moment due to all that jet fuel spread about equally throughout the two towers. Obviously a fanciful fantasy of a study [the fireballs of the two jets crashing into the two towers were generated from the jet fuel which was mostly consumed within those fireballs]. Whatever clowns the Gates Foundation chooses to appoint to its global board, be it Larry Summers [who fired the first Black-American woman to receive a Ph.D. in mathematics from Harvard for warning them about their investment in risky credit derivatives - - Ms. Mack was right as Harvard lost over $1 billion] or Philip Zelikow of the 9/11 Commission, another farce, such a foundation bodes ill for the citizenry as do the individuals it appoints.

Age Suitability

Add Age Suitability

There are no age suitabilities for this title yet.


Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.


Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.


Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Explore Further


Subject Headings


Find it at GSPL

To Top